How to Do a Meta-Analysis: Step-by-Step Guide
A practical workflow for planning, calculating, checking, interpreting, and reporting a defensible meta-analysis.
Read guide →This collection helps researchers move from a study question to an appropriate statistical method. Use the decision guide first when the analysis is unclear, then open the focused guides for confidence intervals, effect sizes, assumptions, and reporting.
Start with the research question, outcome type, study design, and dependence structure. Then choose a method that estimates the quantity you need and report its uncertainty and effect size.
A practical workflow for planning, calculating, checking, interpreting, and reporting a defensible meta-analysis.
Read guide →Choose a multiple-testing correction by defining the hypothesis family, deciding whether to control FWER or FDR, and checking dependence assumptions.
Read guide →The right missing-data strategy depends on why values are missing, how much information is lost, the analysis model, and the assumptions you can defend.
Read guide →Logistic regression models log odds, while odds ratios express multiplicative changes in odds. Predicted probabilities often communicate results more clearly.
Read guide →Eta squared and partial eta squared use different denominators, so the same ANOVA can produce different values.
Read guide →The familiar Wald interval can perform poorly with small samples or proportions near zero or one.
Read guide →Start with the research question and study design, then use variable type and data structure to narrow the method.
Read guide →Begin with the guide closest to your immediate decision. Record the assumptions, settings, and definitions you use, then open the linked DataStatPro workflow to apply the method. Educational examples should be adapted to the actual study protocol and data structure.