What is Statistical Analysis?
Statistical analysis is the science of collecting, exploring, organizing, and interpreting data to uncover patterns, test hypotheses, and make data-driven decisions. In 2025, with AI-powered tools like DataStatPro, statistical analysis has become more accessible and accurate than ever.
π― Key Benefits of Statistical Analysis
- Make evidence-based decisions with confidence
- Identify significant patterns and relationships in data
- Validate research hypotheses scientifically
- Predict future trends and outcomes
- Communicate findings with statistical rigor
Find Your Perfect Statistical Test
Answer a few questions to get a personalized recommendation
What type of data do you have?
Comprehensive Guide to Statistical Tests
π T-Tests: Comparing Means
When to use: Comparing means between groups or against a known value with continuous data
Types of T-Tests:
- One-sample t-test: Compare sample mean to a known population mean
Example: Is average student height different from national average?
- Independent samples t-test: Compare means of two independent groups
Example: Do males and females differ in test scores?
- Paired samples t-test: Compare means of same subjects at different times
Example: Is there improvement after training intervention?
β οΈ Assumptions to Check:
- Data should be approximately normally distributed
- Observations must be independent
- For independent t-test: equal variances (use Levene's test)
- No significant outliers
π ANOVA: Analysis of Variance
When to use: Comparing means across three or more groups
Types of ANOVA:
- One-way ANOVA: One independent variable with 3+ levels
Example: Compare effectiveness of 3 teaching methods
- Two-way ANOVA: Two independent variables
Example: Effect of gender AND age group on salary
- Repeated measures ANOVA: Same subjects measured multiple times
Example: Patient recovery at 1, 3, and 6 months
- MANOVA: Multiple dependent variables
Example: Effect on both satisfaction AND performance
Post-hoc tests: Tukey HSD, Bonferroni, ScheffΓ© (when ANOVA is significant)
π Regression Analysis: Predicting Outcomes
When to use: Predicting outcomes and understanding relationships between variables
Types of Regression:
- Simple Linear Regression: One predictor, continuous outcome
Example: Predict sales from advertising spend
- Multiple Linear Regression: Multiple predictors, continuous outcome
Example: Predict house price from size, location, age
- Logistic Regression: Binary outcome (yes/no)
Example: Predict customer churn (stay/leave)
- Polynomial Regression: Non-linear relationships
Example: U-shaped relationship between stress and performance
π‘ Key Metrics to Report:
- RΒ² (coefficient of determination): Model fit
- Ξ² coefficients: Effect size and direction
- p-values: Statistical significance
- Confidence intervals: Precision of estimates
π² Chi-Square Tests: Categorical Data Analysis
When to use: Analyzing relationships between categorical variables
Types of Chi-Square Tests:
- Chi-square test of independence: Are two variables related?
Example: Is gender associated with product preference?
- Chi-square goodness of fit: Does data match expected distribution?
Example: Are birth days equally distributed across the week?
- McNemar's test: Paired categorical data
Example: Change in voting preference before/after debate
Effect size: CramΓ©r's V (small: 0.1, medium: 0.3, large: 0.5)
π Correlation Analysis: Measuring Relationships
When to use: Measuring strength and direction of relationships between variables
Types of Correlation:
- Pearson correlation: Linear relationship between continuous variables
Range: -1 to +1 (perfect negative to perfect positive)
- Spearman correlation: Monotonic relationship, ordinal data
Use when: Data is ranked or non-normal
- Kendall's tau: Alternative to Spearman, better for small samples
More robust but less powerful than Spearman
- Point-biserial: One continuous, one binary variable
Example: Correlation between pass/fail and study hours
β οΈ Remember: Correlation β Causation
A strong correlation doesn't imply one variable causes the other. Consider confounding variables and use experimental design for causal inference.
π― Non-parametric Tests: Distribution-Free Methods
When to use: When parametric assumptions are violated or with ordinal/ranked data
Common Non-parametric Tests:
- Mann-Whitney U test: Alternative to independent t-test
Compare medians of two independent groups
- Wilcoxon signed-rank test: Alternative to paired t-test
Compare paired observations
- Kruskal-Wallis test: Alternative to one-way ANOVA
Compare 3+ independent groups
- Friedman test: Alternative to repeated measures ANOVA
Compare 3+ related groups
Advantages: No distribution assumptions, robust to outliers, work with ordinal data
Disadvantages: Less statistical power when parametric assumptions are met
Quick Reference: Choosing the Right Test
Research Question | Data Type | Number of Groups | Recommended Test |
---|---|---|---|
Compare 2 group means | Continuous | 2 | Independent t-test |
Compare 3+ group means | Continuous | 3+ | One-way ANOVA |
Predict continuous outcome | Continuous | N/A | Linear regression |
Predict binary outcome | Binary | N/A | Logistic regression |
Test association | Categorical | 2+ | Chi-square test |
Measure relationship | Continuous | N/A | Pearson correlation |
Compare paired observations | Continuous | 2 | Paired t-test |
Non-normal data comparison | Any | 2+ | Non-parametric tests |
Understanding P-Values and Statistical Significance
What is a P-Value?
The p-value is the probability of obtaining results as extreme as observed, assuming the null hypothesis is true. It's NOT the probability that your hypothesis is correct!
Common Significance Levels:
- p < 0.001: Very strong evidence against null hypothesis (***)
- p < 0.01: Strong evidence against null hypothesis (**)
- p < 0.05: Moderate evidence against null hypothesis (*)
- p β₯ 0.05: Insufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis (ns)
π― Best Practices for Reporting P-Values:
- Report exact p-values (e.g., p = 0.023) not just "p < 0.05"
- Always include effect sizes alongside p-values
- Consider practical significance, not just statistical significance
- Use confidence intervals for better interpretation
- Adjust for multiple comparisons when appropriate (Bonferroni, FDR)
β οΈ Common P-Value Misconceptions:
- P-value is NOT the probability the null hypothesis is true
- P-value is NOT the probability your results occurred by chance
- Statistical significance β practical importance
- Non-significant results don't prove the null hypothesis
Effect Sizes: Beyond Statistical Significance
Why Effect Sizes Matter
While p-values tell you whether an effect exists, effect sizes tell you how large and meaningful that effect is. Always report both!
Common Effect Size Measures:
- Cohen's d (t-tests): Small = 0.2, Medium = 0.5, Large = 0.8
- Eta squared (ANOVA): Small = 0.01, Medium = 0.06, Large = 0.14
- RΒ² (Regression): Small = 0.02, Medium = 0.13, Large = 0.26
- Odds Ratio (Logistic): Small = 1.5, Medium = 2.5, Large = 4.0
- Correlation r: Small = 0.1, Medium = 0.3, Large = 0.5
π‘ Interpreting Effect Sizes:
Effect size interpretation depends on context. A "small" effect in medicine might be clinically important, while a "large" effect in social sciences might be typical.
Statistical Power and Sample Size
Planning Your Study: Power Analysis
Statistical power is the probability of detecting an effect if it truly exists. Aim for at least 80% power.
Factors Affecting Power:
- Sample size: Larger samples = more power
- Effect size: Larger effects = easier to detect
- Alpha level: Higher Ξ± (e.g., 0.05 vs 0.01) = more power
- One vs two-tailed: One-tailed tests have more power
π― Sample Size Guidelines:
- T-test: ~30 per group for medium effect
- ANOVA: ~20 per group for medium effect
- Correlation: ~85 for medium effect (r = 0.3)
- Chi-square: ~100-200 total for medium effect
- Regression: 10-15 cases per predictor minimum
Avoid These Common Statistical Mistakes
π« Top 10 Statistical Errors to Avoid:
- P-hacking: Running multiple tests until finding significance
- Ignoring assumptions: Using parametric tests on non-normal data
- Confusing correlation with causation: Inferring cause from association
- Neglecting effect sizes: Focusing only on p-values
- Inadequate sample size: Underpowered studies miss real effects
- Multiple comparisons: Not adjusting for family-wise error
- Cherry-picking results: Reporting only favorable outcomes
- Misinterpreting non-significance: "No evidence" β "evidence of no effect"
- Ignoring outliers: Not checking for influential data points
- Wrong test selection: Using ANOVA for categorical outcomes
Frequently Asked Questions
What's the difference between parametric and non-parametric tests?
Parametric tests assume your data follows a specific distribution (usually normal) and work with interval/ratio data. They include t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation. Non-parametric tests make no distribution assumptions and work with ordinal or non-normal data. They include Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, and Spearman correlation. Use parametric tests when assumptions are met for more statistical power.
When should I use a t-test vs ANOVA?
Use a t-test when comparing means between exactly two groups (e.g., treatment vs control). Use ANOVA when comparing means across three or more groups (e.g., low dose vs medium dose vs high dose vs placebo). Running multiple t-tests instead of ANOVA inflates Type I error rate.
What p-value indicates statistical significance?
The traditional threshold is p < 0.05, meaning less than 5% chance of observing results this extreme if the null hypothesis were true. However, consider your field's standards and the context. Some fields use p < 0.01 or p < 0.001 for stronger evidence. Always report exact p-values and effect sizes.
How do I know if my data is normally distributed?
Check normality using: 1) Visual inspection (histogram, Q-Q plot), 2) Statistical tests (Shapiro-Wilk for n < 50, Kolmogorov-Smirnov for n > 50), 3) Skewness and kurtosis (should be between -2 and +2). For large samples (n > 30), slight deviations from normality are often acceptable due to the Central Limit Theorem.
What's the difference between Type I and Type II errors?
Type I error (false positive) occurs when you reject a true null hypothesis - finding an effect that doesn't exist. The probability is your alpha level (usually 0.05). Type II error (false negative) occurs when you fail to reject a false null hypothesis - missing a real effect. The probability is beta, and power = 1 - beta.
Should I use one-tailed or two-tailed tests?
Use two-tailed tests unless you have a strong theoretical reason to expect effects in only one direction AND you would not be interested in effects in the opposite direction. Two-tailed tests are more conservative and generally preferred in research. One-tailed tests have more power but require strong justification.
Ready to Master Statistical Analysis?
Join thousands of researchers using DataStatPro's AI-powered statistical analysis platform
Related Resources
SPSS Alternative Free
Discover why DataStatPro is the best free alternative to SPSS for students and researchers.
Regression Analysis Tutorial
Step-by-step guide to performing and interpreting regression analysis with real examples.
Sample Size Calculator
Calculate the required sample size for your study based on effect size and desired power.
Data Visualization Guide
Learn to create publication-ready graphs and charts that effectively communicate your results.